Genetics vs. Hard Work: Which One Really Matters for Strength? [Q&A]

In this episode of the Absolute Strength Podcast, Derek and I answer a variety of listener questions. We dive into topics like workout efficiency, balancing intensity and safety in compound lifts, the benefits of saunas and steam rooms, the role of genetics in strength and muscle building, and the recent pushback against evidence-based lifting. Tune in for practical advice, and stay for the endless banter. Sit back, relax, and enjoy!

Questions on the show:

If a routine calls for four sets of 10 reps on something like an Incline press or cable chest flies, and instead, since you want to make your workout shorter, you do one set of 10, then wait 15 to 30 seconds and do three sets of whatever you can get but still around failure, is that as effective for muscle growth as doing one set of 10, then waiting two minutes and repeating until all four sets are done?
I know you guys talk a lot about training close to failure, but how do you balance pushing hard on big compound lifts, lifts, specifically squats and deadlifts, staying safe and avoiding injury?
What’s your take on saunas and steam rooms? Do you think the cardiovascular and respiratory health benefits make them a valuable addition to a routine?
How much do genetics really matter for building muscle and gaining strength? I hear mixed opinions – some people say they’re everything, while others say hard work beats genetics every time.
Why do you think there has been more pushback lately to evidence-based lifting and the scientific lifting community?

If you like this episode and want to be notified when a new one goes live, subscribe to Spotify, iTunes, or Amazon Music.